| Record 19486 View: Standard | Glossary HistCite Guide |
|
Author(s): Coenen L (Coenen, Lars); Lopez FJD (Lopez, Fernando J. Diaz)
Title: Comparing systems approaches to innovation and technological change for sustainable and competitive economies: an explorative study into conceptual commonalities, differences and complementarities
Source: JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION 18 (12): 1149-1160
Date: 2010 AUG
Document Type: Journal : Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.003
Language: English
Comment:
Address: Lund Univ, CIRCLE, S-22100 Lund, Sweden.
Netherlands Org Appl Sci Res TNO Built Environm &, Business Unit Innovat & Environm, NL-2600 AA Delft, Netherlands. Reprint: Coenen, L, Lund Univ, CIRCLE, POB 117, S-22100 Lund, Sweden.
E-mail: lars.coenen@circle.lu.se
fernando.diazlopez@tno.nl Author Keywords: Technological change; Ecological modernisation; Innovation systems; Socio-technical systems; Sustainability
and competitiveness; Clean technology and eco-innovation
KeyWords Plus: STRATEGIC NICHE MANAGEMENT; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; SECTORAL SYSTEMS; RESEARCH AGENDA; REGIME SHIFTS;
DYNAMICS; POLICY; FRAMEWORK; INDUSTRY; TRANSITIONS
Abstract: This paper makes a distinction between three theoretical frameworks that have been highly influential in the discourse on innovation, competitiveness and sustainability: sectoral systems of innovation (SSI), technological innovation systems (TIS) and socio-technical systems (ST-Systems). These frameworks share a common systems approach to innovation but are often positioned as different bodies of literature that correspond to different epistemic communities. This paper is explorative and conceptual in nature. It presents a systematic comparative review of SSI, TIS and ST-Systems based on the following analytical dimensions: (1) system boundaries, (2) actors and networks, (3) institutions, (4) knowledge, (5) dynamics and (6) policy approach. In the concluding section commonalities and differences, of the three approaches, are presented and suggestions for complimentarily are made. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Cited References: *EC, 2006, COMM EUR COMM, P12 *OECD, 1997, NAT INN SYST *OECD, 2009, GREEN GROWTH OV CRIS, P24 *OECD, 2010, EC IND EN GREEN GROW, P280 *SWED PRES EUR UN, 2009, WORK PROGR SWED PRED, P45 AKRICH M, 1995, APPROACH CONSTRUCTIV, P167 AMIN A, 2005, IND INNOV, V12, P465 ASHEIM BT, 2005, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO, P291 ASHEIM BT, 2005, RES POLICY, V34, P1173, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013 BATHELT H, 2003, PROG HUM GEOG, V27, P763, DOI 10.1191/0309132503ph462pr BELZ FM, 2004, SYSTEM INNOVATION TR, P97 BERGEK A, 2008, RES POLICY, V37, P407, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 BIJKER WE, 1995, BICYCLES BAKELITES B BOWKER GC, 2000, SORTING THINGS OUT C BRESCHI S, 1997, SYSTEMS INNOVATION T, P130 CALLEJA I, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P181 CALLON M, 1998, LAWS MARKETS, P1 CALLON M, 1999, ACTOR NETWORK THEORY, P181 CARLSSON B, 1991, J EVOLUTIONARY EC, V1, P93 CARLSSON B, 1997, INT J IND ORGAN, V15, P775 CARLSSON B, 2002, RES POLICY, V31, P233 CAVES RE, 2000, CREATIVE INDUSTRIES CHAMINADE C, 2006, CIRCLE ELECT WORKING, P25 CHANG YC, 2004, TECHNOL SOC, V26, P17 CHRISTENSEN C, 1997, INNOVATORS DILEMMA N CONSTANT EW, 1980, ORIGINS TURBOJET REV DIAZLOPEZ FJ, 2009, 15 ANN SUST DEV RES DIETZ F, 2008, MANAGING TRANSITION, P245 DOLOREUX D, 2005, TECHNOL SOC, V27, P133 DOSI G, 1982, RES POLICY, V11, P147 ECLQUIST C, 2004, SECTORAL SYSTEMS INN, P427 ECLQUIST C, 2005, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO, P181 EDER P, 2003, J CLEAN PROD, V11, P347, DOI 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00060-4 EDQUIST C, 1997, SYSTEMS INNOVATION T, P41 ELZEN B, 1990, WEAPON INNOVATION NE, P173 ETIQUIST C, 1997, SYSTEMS INNOVATION T, P408 ETZKOWITZ H, 2000, RES POLICY, V29, P109 FAGERBERG J, 2005, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO, P1 FOXON T, 2008, J CLEAN PROD S1, V16, PS148, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.011 FRANTZESKAKI N, 2009, FUTURES, V41, P593, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2009.04.009 GARUD R, 2001, PATH DEPENDENCE CREA, P1 GEELS FW, 2002, RES POLICY, V31, P1257 GEELS FW, 2004, RES POLICY, V33, P897, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 GEELS FW, 2004, SYSTEM INNOVATION TR, P19 GEELS FW, 2007, RES POLICY, V36, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 GEELS FW, 2008, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V20, P521, DOI 10.1080/09537320802292982 GRANOVETTER M, 1985, AM J SOCIOL, V91, P481 GREEN K, 1992, TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE, P164 HALL RA, 2001, VARIETIES CAPITALISM HEKKERT MP, 2007, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V74, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002 HEKKERT MP, 2009, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V76, P584, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013 HOLLINGSWORTH JR, 2000, REV INT POLIT ECON, V7, P595 HOOGMA R, 2002, TRANSPORT DEV SUSTAI, P212 JANICKE M, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P557, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.011 JENSEN MB, 2007, RES POLICY, V36, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006 KEMP R, 1994, FUTURES, V26, P1023 KEMP R, 1998, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V10, P175 KEMP R, 2005, JB OKOLOGISCHE OKONO, V4, P123 KONRAD K, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P1190, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.014 KUEHR R, 2007, J CLEAN PROD, V15, P1316 KUHN TS, 1962, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU LBERT, 2007, REG STUD, V41, P103 LIU XL, 2001, RES POLICY, V30, P1091 LUITEN WJ, 2007, INT J INNOVATION SUS, V2, P215 LUNDVALL BA, 1988, TECHNICAL CHANGE EC, P349 LUNDVALL BA, 1992, NATL SYSTEMS INNOVAT, P1 LUNDVALL BA, 2005, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO, P599 MALERBA F, 2002, RES POLICY, V31, P247 MALERBA F, 2004, SECTORAL SYSTEMS INN, P507 MALERBA F, 2005, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO, P181 MALMBERG A, 1999, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V6, P5 MARKARD J, 2008, RES POLICY, V37, P596, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004 MARKARD J, 2009, DIME WORKSH ENV INN MERTON RK, 1973, SOCIOLOGY SCI MONTALVO C, 2008, J CLEAN PROD S1, V16, PS1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.014 MONTALVO C, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P1990 MONTALVO C, 2010, TNO SEMINAR WORKING, P19 MYRELKA LK, 2002, RES POLICY, V31, P1467 NAGEL S, 1999, POLICY ANAL METHODS, P302 NELSON RR, 1982, EVOLUTIONARY THEORY NOOTEBOOM B, 2000, LEARNING INNOVATION NYGAARD S, 2008, COEVOLUTION TECHNOLO PENROSE E, 1959, THEORY GROWTH FIRM PORTER ME, 1995, J ECON PERSPECT, V9, P97 POWELL WW, 2005, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO, P56 RAVEN R, 2004, DEV METHODS, V6, P178 ROBERTSON PL, 1995, RES POLICY, V24, P543 ROHRACHER H, 2009, DRUID SUMM C 2009 IN ROTMANS J, 2000, TRANSITIES TRANSITIE, P83 SAHAL D, 1985, RES POLICY, V14, P61 SCHOT J, 2008, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V20, P537, DOI 10.1080/09537320802292651 SCOTT WR, 1995, INSTITUTIONS ORGANIZ SPAR D, 2001, PIRATES PROPHETS PIO SUURS RAA, 2010, DEP INNOVATION STUDI SUURS RAA, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.032 SWEDBERG R, 1994, HDB EC SOCIOLOGY, P255 TEECE D, 1994, INDUSTRIAL CORPORATE, V3, P357 TRIEBSWETTER U, 2005, J CLEAN PROD, V13, P733, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.01.009 TUKKER A, 2007, J CLEAN PROD, V15, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.08.016 TUNZELMANN V, 2005, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO, P407 VAN A, 2009, ENERGY PROCEDIA, V1, P4591 VANDERLAAK WWM, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P3213, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.11.009 VANDRIEL H, 2005, TECHNOL CULT, V46, P51 VANKLEEF JAG, 2007, J CLEAN PROD, V15, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.06.002 VANLENTE H, 1993, THESIS VANLENTE H, 1998, GETTING NEW TECHNOLO, P195 WALKER W, 2000, RES POLICY, V29, P833 WHITE HC, 1981, AM J SOCIOL, V87, P517 WHITE NC, 1988, SOCIAL STRUCTURES A, P226 WOOLTHUIS RK, 2005, TECHNOVATION, V25, P609, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002 |