Record 7414 View: Standard | Glossary HistCite Guide |
Author(s): Marx D; Tuckerman ME; Hutter J; Parrinello M
Title: The nature of the hydrated excess proton in water
Source: NATURE 397 (6720): 601-604
Date: 1999 FEB 18
Document Type: Journal : Article
DOI:
Language: English
Comment:
Address: Max Planck Inst Festkorperforsch, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
NYU, Dept Chem, New York, NY 10003 USA. NYU, Courant Inst Math Sci, New York, NY 10003 USA. Reprint: Marx, D, Max Planck Inst Festkorperforsch, Heisenbergstr 1, D-70569
Stuttgart, Germany. E-mail:
Author Keywords:
KeyWords Plus:
Abstract: Explanations for the anomalously high mobility of protons in liquid water began with Grotthuss's idea(1,2) of structural diffusion' nearly two centuries ago. Subsequent explanations have refined this concept by invoking thermal hopping(3,4), proton tunnelling(5,6) or solvation effects(7). More recently, two main structural models have emerged for the hydrated proton. Eigen(8,9) proposed the formation of an H9O4+ complex in which an H3O+ core is strongly hydrogen-bonded to three H2O molecules. Zundel(10,11), meanwhile, supported the notion of an H5O2+ complex in which the proton is shared between two H2O molecules. Here we use ab initio path integral(12-14) simulations to address this question, These simulations include time-independent equilibrium thermal and quantum fluctuations of all nuclei, and determine interatomic interactions from the electronic structure. We find that the hydrated proton forms a fluxional defect in the hydrogen-bonded network with both H9O4+ and H5O2+ occurring only in the sense of 'limiting' or 'ideal' structures. The defect can become delocalized over several hydrogen bonds owing to quantum fluctuations. Solvent polarization induces a small barrier to proton transfer, which is washed out by zero-point motion. The proton can consequently be considered part of a 'low-barrier hydrogen bond'(15,16), in which tunnelling is negligible and the simplest concepts of transition-state theory do not apply. The rate of proton diffusion is determined by thermally induced hydrogen-bond breaking in the second solvation shell.
Cited References: AGMON N, 1996, J CHIM PHYS PCB, V93, P1714 ANDO K, 1997, J PHYS CHEM B, V101, P10464 ATKINS PW, 1998, PHYSICAL CHEM, P741 BECKE AD, 1988, PHYS REV A, V38, P3098 BENOIT M, 1998, NATURE, V392, P258 BERNAL JD, 1933, J CHEM PHYS, V1, P515 BILLETER SR, 1998, J PHYS CHEM A, V102, P4669 CLELAND WW, 1994, SCIENCE, V264, P1887 DEGROTTHUSS CJT, 1806, ANN CHIM, V58, P54 EIGEN M, 1964, ANGEW CHEM INT EDIT, V3, P1 GUISSANI Y, 1988, J CHEM PHYS, V88, P5850 HALLEY JW, 1993, J CHEM PHYS, V98, P4110 HUCKEL E, 1928, Z ELKTROCHEM ANGEW P, V34, P546 HUGGINS ML, 1936, J PHYS CHEM-US, V40, P723 KOCHANSKI E, 1997, ADV QUANTUM CHEM, V28, P273 KOMATSUZAKI T, 1994, CHEM PHYS, V180, P239 LARIA D, 1994, CHEM PHYS, V180, P181 LEE C, 1988, PHYS REV B, V37, P785 LOBAUGH J, 1996, J CHEM PHYS, V104, P2056 MARX D, 1994, Z PHYS B CON MAT, V95, P143 MARX D, 1996, J CHEM PHYS, V104, P4077 OJAMAE L, 1998, J CHEM PHYS, V109, P5547 SAGNELLA DE, 1998, J CHEM PHYS, V108, P2073 SCHMIDT RG, 1997, BER BUNSEN PHYS CHEM, V101, P1816 SCHMITT UW, 1998, J PHYS CHEM B, V102, P5547 SPRIK M, 1996, J CHEM PHYS, V105, P1142 STEARN AE, 1937, J CHEM PHYS, V5, P113 TROULLIER N, 1991, PHYS REV B, V43, P1993 TUCKERMAN M, 1995, J PHYS CHEM-US, V99, P5749 TUCKERMAN ME, 1996, J CHEM PHYS, V104, P5579 TUCKERMAN ME, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P817 TUNON I, 1993, J PHYS CHEM-US, V97, P5547 VUILLEUMIER R, 1998, J PHYS CHEM B, V102, P4261 WANNIER G, 1935, ANN PHYS-BERLIN, V24, P545 WEI DQ, 1994, J CHEM PHYS, V101, P7633 WICKE E, 1954, Z PHYS CHEM FRANKFUR, V1, P340 ZUMDEL G, 1976, HYDROGEN BOND RECENT, V2, P683 ZUNDEL G, 1968, Z PHYS CHEM FRANKFUR, V58, P225 |